Why is the planet called melancholia




















Regardless of its entertainment value, however, for anyone with a scholarly interest in the emotions Melancholia raises some questions worthy of consideration. The story depicts the lives and relationships of a handful of people in the lead-up to this Armageddon. Claire tries to care for her, a frustrating task. Meanwhile, the planet Melancholia moves closer to earth.

But Claire is anxious and scared. John eventually discovers that he is wrong and proceeds to take a lethal overdose of pills rather than face the end of the world. Top Gap. See more gaps ». Create a list ». Seen in Existential Mind Meld. Film jeg skal se. See all related lists ». Share this page:. Clear your history. That opening montage shows us The End. However, the visuals we see are not all things that really happen.

Part of it is a depiction of how Justine feels things are unraveling. Now Justine, played by Kirsten, is suffering from a terrible case of depression.

It is revealed at the end that she seems to be clairvoyant too. The above are things that Justine, with her abilities of perception, is feeling. And that this too is short lived and will all come to an end.

We see an apparently happy Justine heading to her marriage party with her husband, Michael. While things appear dandy on the surface, as it always is with depression, Justine is struggling to lead a normal life.

Justine and Michael arrive late because of their stretch limo, and they have a quick conversation about the star Antares being the main star in the Scorpio constellation. As they enter, the wedding planner is putting together a little game where people need to submit their bids against a random number of beans in a jar.

The sisters have a messed up family. Their mom and dad are separated and go to the extent of fighting at the reception. Claire takes Justine away and tells her to keep her cool through the party. He assigns his nephew to draw it out of her. Justine tries talking to her mother to say that something is gripping her with fear, only to get a cold response asking her to run away. And how Gaby lashes out at the very notion of a wedding or a party. There is displacement here that is frightening.

In any film involving the destruction of the globe, we know that, if it is not to be saved, there must be a "money shot" depicting the actual cataclysm. I doubt any could do better than von Trier does here. There are no tidal waves. No animals fleeing through burning forests. No skyscrapers falling. None of that easy stuff.

No, there is simply a character standing on a hill and staring straight at the impending doom, as von Trier shows it happening in what logically must be slow motion, with a fearsome preliminary merging of planetary atmospheres. Violent death is often a shabby business in the movies. It happens in depressing bedrooms, bloody bathtubs, shattered cars, bleak alleys. Its victims are cast down empty of life. Here is a character who says, I see it coming, I will face it, I will not turn away, I will observe it as long as my eyes and my mind still function.

Is it fair of me to speculate that von Trier himself regards death in that way? He tends to be grandiose, but if one cannot be grandiose in imagining one's own death, then when is grandiosity justified? Roger Ebert was the film critic of the Chicago Sun-Times from until his death in In , he won the Pulitzer Prize for distinguished criticism.

Rated R for some graphic nudity, sexual content and language. Kirsten Dunst as Justine.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000